July 12th, 2010
I think it is becoming obvious that none of my blogs so far are about Plastic Surgery. I promise to start blogging about Plastic Surgery starting with my thoughts on Liposuction with my next blog. Now however I must share my musings about one tiny part of an otherwise major issue I have with the pharmaceutical industry. That for another day and probably a number of blogs (see my thoughts on statins vs. Vit C in my first blog).
This starts with a long walk I took this morning with my daughter. On the way out the door she told me I was a color thief. I was wearing the same color top and shorts she was. After having a laugh I began to think about the classic 1998 movie Pleasantville. If you have not seen it, make a point of renting it soon. This iconic movie is about 1990s teenagers that find themselves in a 1950s black and white TV sitcom. The movie unfolds with them introducing emotions in an otherwise bland community where no one has any passion. There is no love, no sadness, no highs or lows. As emotion and passion start catching on people start to have color. Their clothes, their hair and skin and makeup all come “alive.” It is very confusing for some of the characters and naturally it is met in some cases with open hostility. Most want to continue to live in this don’t rock the boat world. Of course one may not have the horrible depression and anxiety, but one also misses out on the wondrous highs that come with living a full life. This then led me to ponder about all the people I have seen in my 26 years as a doctor that have been on antidepressants and anti anxiety drugs. In fact, as many articles in recent years have pointed out, it is has reached epidemic levels. In an article published in 2007 CNN stated that the CDC said that antidepressants were the most prescribed drug in the U.S. Of 2.4 billion prescriptions written, 118 million were for antidepressants. This does not include anti anxiety drugs like xanax. The problem as I see it is two fold. First, this is a multi billion dollar industry. Make no mistake, the pharmaceutical industry has a vested interest in selling their product. They fund, for the most part, all of the studies that lead to the conclusions that the drugs work as they were designed to work. Sound a little self serving. If you are a major medical school doctor/scientist and want to continue your career you best do some research and publish some papers. Your research gets funded if the results coincide with what the people giving you money want. There are checks and balances and some drugs simply don’t pass the muster. And we have a fairly legitimate FDA process with drug trials and etc. But in the end, as long as the drugs do no harm, at least obvious harm, then all is well with the world. After all millions, billions will be made, portfolios in 401ks will rise, jobs are created, yada yada. But at what cost? We have a society with a large subset of people that simply will not tolerate any discomfort. They won’t tolerate sadness, brief depression that may have a legitimate cause – “my mother just died” for example, or a bit of anxiety. “Doctor, make it go away” they say. And we prescribe a pill that does just that. It makes them Stepford wives and husbands. To what end, though? I say we need these discomforts in life to develop healthy coping skills and emotional tools to deal with adversity. Further, there are recent articles saying these people that take these meds for more than a little while will change their brain chemistry, possibly permanently with not pleasant consequences. The truth is we don’t know the long term affects of many of these meds. And I think it robs them of the color in their lives. I think it steals the passion, the sorrow yes, but also the supreme joy. I also think it is a statement on our human condition. Don’t want to be overweight anymore? Here is a pill. Or here is liposuction. Or worse, here is an operation guaranteed to shed pounds. No effort required. And I think it speaks to the wider problem facing society today, and that is many people seeking outside themselves for the source of happiness and joy. We have computers, and
Obviously there are those that seriously need antidepressants. There are those that are suffering terribly. I don’t recommend going backward. Many people’s lives have been saved. But the indiscriminate prescribing has to slow down. Or, too many black and white, nay gray people will be walking around. And what fun is that?
Tags: antidepressants, pharmaceuticals, pleasantville
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
June 1st, 2010
Recently i had a patient come in for a breast lift with augmentation. She was a “full figured” gal and her breasts, although generous, lacked firmness and were very ptotic (droopy). We decided that she definitely needed a breast lift and a modest implant to give her upper pole fullness because I thought her breast tissue simply lacked enough glandular tissue. She did well but some months later came back in and was upset with the appearance of her breasts. Indeed, they didn’t look good at all. They were droopy. The areolas weren’t round anymore. And although she still had the upper pole fullness from the implants, the breast were ‘draped’ over them and hng down instead of perching on top of them. This is the classic double bubble deformity. It typically appears in women who get a breast augmentation and start out with a B cup or larger. As the years progress the breast tissue loses some of it’s “stand-upness” (sic) and begins to droop over the implant. they still look great in a bra and clothes, but out of them… well not so much. So in my recent patient I think she went on to get super motivated and lost 15 – 20 pounds. The result was that she lost volume in her breasts and instead of being firm they got a little soft. i.e. not the way I left them at the end of her surgery. There’s always a little swelling after surgery and then a little relaxation. But the point here is that certain cosmetic surgeries stand up fine to weight loss (no pun intended). Others may not. So as part of an aesthetic consultation one should always consider what the patient’s weight is and if they are stable at that weight. While I much prefer to operate on people that have a relatively low BMI and are in great shape, it is perfectly fine to take on patients that are somewhat overweight as long as they are stable at that weight. It’s the gaining and losing significant amounts or weight that plays havoc with cosmetic procedures.
Posted in Surgery, Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
April 27th, 2010
Let me start by saying breast reduction patients are very, very happy patients. The vast majority really don’t care what the scars look like. They are just thrilled to be divested of massive breasts that have been the bane of their existence. They can’t exercise. They have chronic neck, shoulder and back pain. When they are young they have trouble finding clothes off the rack or tops to match bottoms. And when they are young, 14, 15 , 16 etc, guys primarily look them in the breasts not eyes. The avg patient seeking breast reduction is 30+. Young women, in their late teens or twenties usually avoid the operation because they are simply not ready for the trade out of scars on their breasts for smaller breasts. There is an alternative however.
In some patients that are younger (less than 40ish), have few or no stretch marks, and whose nipples at least point forward one can do liposuction. In the true sense of the word there are scars. But scars from liposuction are tiny little transverse incisions that are placed under the breast or along the inframammary fold. The results can be very gratifying although one can not always guarantee good projection. i.e. they may not be real perky. The truth is many breast reduction patients done the classic way also wind up with a bit of a flat breast anyway.
The following pre/post op pics are of a 22 yr old college soccer player that came in complaining that her breasts were to big socially AND got in the way when playing soccer. She was on a Div. 1 college team and was passionate about soccer. I performed liposuction only and these pics are taken my standard three months post op:

pre op frontal view

post op frontal view

pre op lateral

post op lateral
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
April 25th, 2010
When I first started out as a plastic surgeon I saw all types of patients that a general plastic surgery practice might see. These included reconstructive cases like hand trauma and disease (arthritis, carpal tunnel,etc), bad wounds, facial trauma, breast cancer reconstruction, and some cosmetic surgery. As the years progressed I have transitioned such that today I do only Aesthetic surgery more often called cosmetic surgery. An interesting thing has happened though in the past ten years. Now people want to know what area of plastic surgery do I do. Wow have things gotten super specialized! Well I do all areas of Aesthetics but I will say I limit liposuction. “Why”, you ask? Well lets first put things in perspective. According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons in 2008 approximately 250,000 Liposuction cases were performed in the USA. Placing this procedure 3rd to Breast Augmentation and Nose reshaping. Yet in my practice liposuction is probably 9th or 10th. It’s a rather easy operation to perform with few complications. Patients are usually gratified. So why not do more of these cases. The truth is many of my patients are word of mouth referrals and they all know I typically send away most people asking for liposuction. That’s not to say that there aren’t very good candidates, I just think those are a whole lot less than what most of my colleagues take to the OR.
Consider this, most humans have the number of fat cells they are going to have in their body established by the time they are about two years old. After that the fat cell just get larger, they don’t increase in number. Getting larger by the way is hypertrophy. Increased number is hyperplasia. Anyway some folks are preprogrammed to put on extra weight in an asymmetric way. Take for example the tall slender person with large fatty deposits on their outer thighs. The so called saddle bag deformity. Or, as one of my patients said, the extra stuff that gives women square hips after babies. My feeling is that if you are in reasonably good health and within 10 – 20 lbs of your ideal body weight and have an area of fatty tissue that simply will not respond to serious diet AND vigorous exercise, than you are probably a candidate for liposuction. There are other criteria like skin elsticity, etc too. But what about the patient that is ‘full’ in the calves, thighs, hips, tummy, back and under the chin? Some of my colleagues will offer total body liposuction. Or worse they will call it liposculpture as if that term will make it seem more defensible. It is not. It is mercenary. In fact I believe you are doing these people harm. In two years they will be back where they started except now the fat will have returned in areas possible not accessible to lipo. These areas include inside the belly around the intestines, liver and heart. It has to go somewhere.
On the other hand I see many folks that come in and just have fuller figures, have been stable at their weight for years and have no desire or intention of becoming more slender. They just want an area that is out of proportion reduced. I think it is perfectly reasonable to go ahead with these folks. Likewise an older person with poor elasticity that may get a volume improvement in a difficult area but whose skin may be wavy afterwards due to poor contraction.
So, that my views. Naturally I do liposuction. I just limit patients who need diet and exercise and refer them to the “Healthy Lifestyles” page on my web site: http://www.drmoliver.com/surgery/lifestyles.php
Posted in Surgery | No Comments »
April 6th, 2010
Many times I see patients in my aesthetic surgery practice that desire some type of breast surgery, be it an augmentation, lift or combination. Some of these women also have either enlarged (hypertrophied) or elongated nipples. Some are second to breast feeding, others are purely genetic (inherited). After breast augmentation these nipples can become very prominent indeed. In fact many of these women will have to continue using the padded bras they were hoping to throw out.
This past September I presented a paper on a type of nipple reduction surgery that I perform at the annual meeting of the Texas Society of Plastic Surgeons. I was grateful that it was warmly received. Historically virtually every description of nipple reduction techniques ALL closed off the breast. The operations all severed the milk ducts and closed them off. The technique I devised is much more physiologic, leaves the ducts open and they heal beautifully. In all the cases I have performed I have had no complications. The wound heals in about 5-7 days, is not painful and is easily performed at the time of the other breast surgery. In fact it can also be done under local anesthesia in someone that just wants the nipple reduction.None of these patients have had decreased nipple sensation.
I have recently been invited to present this same paper, now with more patients enrolled, at the annual meeting of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery this August in San Francisco.
Here are some pre and post op pictures:

Nipple Reduction with gel augmentation

Nipple reduction with gel augmentation

Nipple Reduction with Saline Augmentation
Posted in Papers | No Comments »
December 1st, 2009

Blog 2.0
Every once in a while I am at a meeting, talking with some one or reading something and I literally have a wow moment. About fifteen years ago I was at a meeting listening to a renowned occuloplastic surgeon. He shared that he always has his patients do a particular exercise after lower lid surgery and has never had an ectropion since that time. It made so much sense that I adopted it and it’s been a wonderful addition to that part of my practice. These ‘pearls of wisdom’ can be hard to find, particularly at medical meetings. I can sit and listen for an entire weekend and not find one pearl. Pearls are best found listening though. And the best way to find em is to listen to successful people in their trade that have been doing what they do for a while. So here is a great pearl.
I was out with a running friend, Dr. Mark Davis this past Saturday morning. My daughter Morgan came with us since she was in from college for the Thanksgiving break. Morgan has been suffering with an upper back stabbing ‘bone on bone’ pain for months, maybe a year on and off. Morgan describes it as along the posterior spine, mid line upper back lowest point of the back of the neck. Mark says yep, we see a lot of it. Here is his explanation. ‘The head weighs 25 – 35 lbs. And the posterior paraspinal muscles simply are not designed to support that kind of weight. They are designed for stabilising the weight as one turns one’s head this way and that. Apparently with the onset of the science of ergonomics body positioning was improved as it related to personal computers. College students that study either at lap tops (apparently the most recent culprit) or long hours over books with their heads bent over over fatigue these small muscles. Muscles such as the Multifidus (I didn’t remember that one from anatomy – he did). After they fatigue the stress transfers to the ligaments between the spinous processes and one winds up with chronic inflammation, sort of a tendinitis in the back of the lower neck. Answer, better ergonomics. get a separate screen and put it up so that you are looking at it instead of down. This plus resistance training with perhaps kettlebells that are great for the posterior chain.
What turned out to be interesting for me is that general surgeons that operate standing and looking straight down are at particularly high risk of cervical disk disease after years of flexing their necks forward and getting huge pressure on their disks. Fortunately I operate looking forward or up (under breasts, tummies or faces
although I do have to twist my body which causes other issues, a different blog. When I turned about 48 presbyopia kicked in and I needed reading glasses for near work. luckily my optometrist suggested bifocals with an extra large lower part so that I had a large field of view. What it does is encourage me to keep my head up if I want to see close. Thinking back I use to have that same pain sometimes that resolved with bifocals! The other thing that happened this week was while running again (yeah I’m kinda into it) on a treadmill this time because the weather sucked I developed the same pain after a 45 minutes and realized that I had been looking down at the console too much. A trainer friend of mine told me that it is very important while running to not let your hips rock back and upper body fall forward while running, and keep your head up. Now I know why.
Dr. Mark Davis is a practicing Chiropractor in the Clear Lake area of Houston.
Posted in Thoughts | 4 Comments »
November 28th, 2009
Ok so this is my first blog ever but about a topic I have been thinking about intensely for about a year. Two weeks ago while on a run an analogy came me that seems to perfectly describe the concept.
There were two towns along a river. One town was blessed by being much higher than the river and having naturally high stone cliffs. When the water would rise as it did from time to time this town never flooded. The second town however, was at the same level as the river. The town people long ago realized they had to build dikes. In addition they had to maintain the dikes. They did this buy using the hard wood from the local forest. Every two to three hours a group would come by and repair parts of the dikes that had been damaged by the force of the river. As long as they maintained the dikes would good healthy solid wood and did it often they never flooded either. After a while the second town’s people became complacent. They felt that every two hours was a bit much. They couldn’t be at work or in the fields and be efficient with their time so they started doing the repairs every six to eight hours. Also, no one would go out all night long. To make matters worse the quality of the wood was decreasing because they had such a large population that they started using inferior wood. They began to have floods. The floods were so devastating that they had to do something. It was killing many people every time it flooded. fact was it was practically killing off the town each time it flooded. So they petitioned the state to put in a dam upstream to control the amount of water coming down the river. Lo and behold by decreasing the amount of water in the river there were almost no more floods. In fact several of the learned people of the town were able to publish studies showing that over the ensuing fifty years lowering the water level had a absolute correlation with a reduction in floods and deaths. There was no doubt. A few people pointed out that perhaps just maintaining the dikes would have been better. No floods and plenty of water for the farms to be healthy. Since all readily admitted that water was necessary. But these folks ideas were drowned out by the dam owners who now charged a fee and were making a lot of money “protecting the town from flood and death.” High water causes flooding and death. The minority pointed to the town with naturally strong dikes as evidence that it was the dikes not the water, but alas no one was listening.
So that was my parable. Here are some facts.
Primates, guinea pigs and fruit bats all share an interesting commonality. They are the only mammals that do not produce their own Vitamin C. Care to guess which mammals develop coronary heart disease? Guinea pigs and primates are the only mammals that get coronary artery disease as defined as tears in the lining of their coronary arteries with accumulation of cholesterol plaques. In fact research scientists that study coronary artery disease and atherosclerotic vascular disease in general use guinea pigs preferentially for this reason. As it turns out if one lowers the level of cholesterol in the blood of guinea pigs or man (and there are tons of very good studies that prove this unequivocally) one will see a corresponding decrease in plaques, coronary artery disease, strokes – athersclerotic vascular disease in general. Just like the river water. But what about all the other mammals that make their own Vit. C and never get vascular disease? Bears run cholesterol levels of 500! They don’t have heart attacks. In fact half of all heart attacks occur in people with normal cholesterol levels. Fruit bats by the way do not get heart disease or vascular disease. They eat fruit all day! It is thought that somewhere way back in our evolution we lost the capacity to make Vit. C. But for most of mans’ evolution we have eaten every few hours, mostly nibbling and foraging as well as eating meat. Now we eat two to three times a day and whatever small amount of Vit. C we get isn’t enough and is gone in a couple of hours anyway.
There is ample evidence that the whole cholesterol business of the pharmaceutical industry is based on premises that are a bit misguided if not deceitful. There are pockets of people, notably in Italy where they have very high cholesterol levels and live into old age without heart attacks or strokes. Again, what about the bears? Read about cholesterol and you find that our bodies actually make the high cholesterol that our doctors warn us is so bad. I refer you to this article for more about the cholesterol lie.
So what to do? Many, including myself believe that number one the statins are probably really bad for you. We need cholesterol in our bodies. I recently heard that one company is now promoting chewable lipitor for children. Oh my god!! Rather, consider taking Vit. C on a regular basis. You can find tons of literature on the web describing what Vit. C does. It has many, many roles in our bodies but perhaps one of the most important is cross linking collagen or making collagen stronger so it doesn’t tear as easy. In fact there are studies that show those very same guinea pigs had substantially prolonged life spans when fed a constant source of Vit. C. There is one important caveat though. Vit. C is a water soluble vitamin so it washes out of your body in an hour or so. So my answer is either eat something high in Vit. C every two hours or take a timed release 1000 mg vitamin C capsule twice a day. Vitamin C repairs the ‘dikes’. It keeps the intima of our arteries healthy. Obviously there is a lot more to good health, but this is one more step in right direction. And for heavens sake, lets stop with the crazy obsession with cholesterol levels and bloods tests to measure it. I know it creates jobs and stimulates the economy but I just think we can be doing better things with our bodies than shoveling lipid lowering drugs into it.
Before I close I want to give credit to Dr. John Adams, a dear friend and the first person that told me about guinea pigs and Vitamin C.
Posted in Thoughts | 2 Comments »